Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rise of the Legend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rise of the Legend

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL (Simplified Chinese)

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL (Traditional Chinese)

Sources are just PR. No coverage to show subject meets WP:FILMNOT. Mdtemp (talk) 18:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because the trade papers referenced in this article are reliable sources that count toward this topic's notability. "Press releases" are written by the companies. If journalists reference press releases as part of their coverage, that is acceptable. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sorry, nominator, a little WP:BEFORE shows coverage of this completed film topic meeting the caveats of WP:NFF (paragraph 3), and yes, Eric's correct... reliable sources may refer to press releases within the body of their greater independent coverage. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Satisfies film notability criteria. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:25, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.